Is charging people more than $10 to immigrate unconstitional? - eight point charges
I thought that the scale of recent immigration proposal in Congress, and then I remembered this little detail in the Constitution.
Article 1, Section 9
The migration or importation of such persons as one of the States now existing shall think good to admit should not through Congress before the year einstausendachthundertacht forbidden, but a tax or levy can be lifted on the import of not more than ten dollars per person.
I note that it remains valid. And the recent proposal would be unconstitutional?
Friday, February 12, 2010
Eight Point Charges Is Charging People More Than $10 To Immigrate Unconstitional?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
13 comments:
What is the problem when a group of people who are known for breaking the law?
Personally, I'm just glad the real question of the violation of laws address to stop and try to ignore this very important issue.
Under the law, a person that becomes a criminal record is not a start, giving easy access to obtaining citizenship, too. Some gov. try to overlook this important point is that everyone would get to the next time you are ready for re-election has to remember.
Yes, but $ 10 for inflation, rose only $ 5,000 in today's money, the "eye for an eye, if you know: P
Nimrod! This clause has expired one hundred and eighty-nine years ago! How about a little reading before publication. Puns. You are not in favor of the illegals come with an argument so you try to play word games.
The latest proposal calls for a fine of $ 5000, not a right or a fee. I do not know whether this is money or who believe that this ridiculous figure for the needy.
Hey, this is our Constitution for the citizens, not a fence jumper. You're not a citizen. You are a criminal. You are il-legal!
So, the plan to fence the back the other way and make us a favor!
$ 10. I would not leave you here for Fence Jumpers million!
Perhaps employers to hire foreigners and "temporary workers" should be held liable for the payment of their fees to emigrate. As for those already here illegally, it would be inappropriate in the deportation of all. They should not be intelligent enough to be rewarded in order to escape detection than in the United States, on 1 January 2007. If approved, there will be another swarm of even higher for illegal immigrants in the country, believing that another "amnesty" in a few years to be awarded on the road. Why can not believe it? We have shown that this happens every few years.
$ 10 free, sounds good to me, for the immigrants.
Wow, what a deal.
It is still valid, as it still 1808?
Buddy, there is a problem with your schedule ...
In any case, he would prefer to talk about the rights of state control over immigration, which is almost better - but in California .... move
--
If you had not expired in 1808, is to admit it, what is this part of the "migration or importation of such persons as one of the states hold good now existing, shall not be prohibited by Congress prior eight years hunderttausendacht. ..".
America does not need more immigrants, or want to do is legal or illegal.
these laws is that now everything is at a higher price. are no longer living in the 1800s.
Bush demanded that all illegal immigrants receive amnesty, total tax revenue in the amnesty for his criminal invasion of our nation.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index ...
No, because it was not written when we were attacked by a sh * 3 World Thole
Do you have to be REALLY countries like Mexico? And you? "
Post a Comment